I read a lot a href" http:spooool.ietagdisorder "carvedilol abz 12 5 mg
a WB: It depends on how the whole tax code is set up. In terms of the really wealthy people, I dont think it makes much difference whether or not theyre deductible. Less than 1 percent of the money I have given away has been deductible. My carry-forward is $11 billion or something that. It doesnt mean anything. I know some other pretty wealthy people who have given away a lot of money tax deductions actually had nothing to do with it. then Im sure it does with some people. What the total sensitivity to deductibility is, its hard to tell. Some people dont itemize deductions at all obviously. I dont have a strong feeling. Of course, everybody who runs a philanthropic organization doesnt want it touched. I do not have a strong feeling that its sacred that they be fully deductible or what portion of income. The code says to me if I give appreciated securities to a controlled foundation I , I cant deduct more than 20 percent of my adjusted gross income. If I give cash to public charities, I can deduct 50 percent. So weve got a lot of policy already built into the code. Do I think that 20 percent versus 50 percent has changed the mix of how people behave? I dont think so very much. Q: Youre a contrarian investor. Today, we had Tiger21, a group of U.S. Canadian multimillionaire investors, choosing Berkshire Hathaway as their top pick, displacing Apple. To use your own famous phrase, should other investors be fearful as these buyers get greedy?